Wednesday, June 08, 2011


'man' is only a sub-string of 'atman', and not atman by itself.
Perhaps, just perhaps, Ramanuja was right after all.


Karthik said...

wow! I like this post! What made you think so btw?

Krishna said...

Thanks !
The first part just struck me, and it connected itself to the second one.
No particular reason for this line of thought :)